منابع مشابه
Yildirim et al. Reply.
A Reply to the Comment by S. Skanthakumar, J. W. Lynn, and I. W. Sumarlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2842 (1995).
متن کاملTharyan Et Al Reply
may be because cases of gul dependence are usually not brought for consultation to the psychiatrists. It has been our experience that there is usually an increase in the symptomatic abuse of this product in psychotic disorders and episodes of depressive illness. This report is an effort to bring to the notice of researchers in the field of psychiatry and related fields, the endemic abuse of thi...
متن کاملHong Et Al. Reply to Canul-chay Et Al
Canul-Chay et al. [1] have conducted the segregation experiment of binary granular mixtures in a bed and subjected the bed to vibration. They report that the reverse Brazil-Nut phenomenon (RBNP) was never observed in their experiments and thus conclude that such does not exist. However, we have clearly demonstrated in [2] by Molecular Dynamics simulations that the reverse Brazil-Nut problem not...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
سال: 2007
ISSN: 0012-1622,1469-8749
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2003.tb00864.x